• Home
  • News
  • Reviews
    • Off-Road Tests
    • Driving impressions
    • Shootouts
  • Travel
    • Travel Stories
  • Blogs
    • Adventurer Interviews
    • Kingsley Holgate
    • Johan Badenhorst of Voetspore
    • Camp Site reviews
    • Mountain Passes of South Africa
    • Tech
    • Retro Rides
  • Multimedia
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Cars
    • Used Cars For Sale
    • New Cars For Sale in South Africa
    • Demo Cars For Sale
    • Car News
    • Car Valuation
    • Joburg
    • Cape Town

Bakkie of the Year 8th Place: Mitsubishi Triton 2.4Di-D 4×4 AT

by Gerhard Horn

24 March 2020

Before this test commenced, we threw the Triton’s name in the proverbial hat of bakkies that could possibly upset the apple cart when it came to the results. It certainly upset the apple cart… but not necessarily for the right reasons.

VITAL SCORES

  • 4×4 ability: 95.6%
  • Fuel consumption: 94%
  • Handling: 93.4%
  • Interior: 87.2%
  • Weight carrying ability: 84.8%
  • Towing: 80.9%
  • Safety: 69.9%
  • Long-term ownership: 62.1%
  • Judges call: 45.8%

VITAL NUMBERS

  • Tare: 2 150kg (full tank & driver)
  • GVM: 2 880kg
  • Load permitted to GVM: 730kg
  • Price: R599 995
  • Sales (December 2019): 28 (range)

Thumbs up: 4×4 ability

Thumbs down: Long-term ownership

The Mitsubishi Triton is fitted with the brand’s excellent Super Select II 4WD system, and we raved about the Triton’s off-road ability on a recent extended trip to Mozambique.

We liked it so much that, ahead of this test, we reckoned the Triton could possibly ruffle a few tail feathers in the overall standing.

But then we started adding up all the test data and Malcolm Kinsey submitted his famous ‘parts bin’ pricing comparison data. And our independent judges spent some time behind the wheel.

Let’s start with the good stuff. As expected, the unique Super Select II 4WD system (with

a selection between 2H, 4H (open centre diff), 4H Lock (locked centre diff) and 4Low) helped the Triton score third place in the 4×4 test. It scored another third place in the fuel economy segment.

For the majority of the other tests, the Mitsubishi recorded middle-of-the-road results – okay, but not great.

There were a few ‘oh dears’, too. Most notable was the parts bin comparison. With a total of R202 111, the Triton bin was a notable R140 000 more expensive than the winner in this sub-segment (Isuzu D-Max).

Our judges were also not overly impressed by the Triton’s on-road driving manners,

the ratios of the six-speed automatic gearbox and the ride on corrugated dirt. This resulted in the third-lowest score in this subjective segment.

Safety was another area in which the Triton did not score highly. In most international markets, the Triton gets autonomous braking and fancy lane-keep assist systems standard on high-end models. Here we have to make do without these aids, due to cost factors.

In the ‘90s, when the Mitsubishi Colt was manufactured here in SA, the brand shifted about a thousand units per month.

Now it’s down to just 28 Tritons per month (December 2019).

Sadly, the Triton seems to have fallen victim of a volatile economic climate and unfavourable importation concords.

← Previous Next →
Latest Videos

Watch: Reviewing the Land Rover Defender 130 D300 First Edition

ISUZU D-Max AT35 an off-road weapon

ALSO IN THIS CATEGORY

  • Launch review: Suzuki Jimny 5-door
  • Off-roading on ice: Tips for safe ice-driving
  • All-Terrain training is a must for the aspiring off-roader
  • Watch: 2023 Bronco tested off-road
  • Review: Ford’s next-gen Single Cab a wondrous workhorse
Subscribe Today
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • We use cookies
  • Covid-19 portal
  • Advertise with us
  • News
  • Travel
  • Blogs
  • Cars
Multimedia
  • Galleries
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
Reviews
  • Off-Road Tests
  • Driving Impressions
  • Shootouts
CAPE TOWN OFFICE: 36 Old Mill Road, Ndabeni, Maitland, 7405, Western Cape > Telephone: (021) 530 3300 > Fax: (021) 530 3333
© Copyright Leisure Wheels


×